Human Rights Radar

Identify companies at risk of becoming complicit in human rights incidents


Companies that are active in countries and territories where grave human rights violations often take place run a heightened risk of complicity in these violations even as a matter of  their normal course of business. Sustainalytics’ research enables investors to identify these companies, understand the nature of their activities and how those activities pose risks for human rights incidents.

Investors can use Human Rights Radar to gain a deeper view into potential human rights-related portfolio risks and ensure compliance with client-specific investment mandates, investment policies and international norms and treaties.

Key Benefits


Identify public companies complicit in human rights violations.



Learn about campaigns that have been initiated against the company.


Understand the role and nature of the company’s involvement as part of the final integrated human rights risk assessment.


Receive country reports with background information on international treaties and human rights concerns.


Take a rights-first approach with alignment to the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights.


Access up-to-date and high quality research from collection and processing of thousands of news sources on a daily basis.

Research Overview:

Sustainalytics analyzes a company’s involvement based on...

Nature of Involvement

Uses the following criteria to classify the severity and accountability of involvement:

  • Direct violation of human rights
  • Provision of tailored products and services
  • Benefits perpetrators or exacerbates grievances
  • Minor economic activities or sales

Impact of Involvement

Assesses whether a business activity normalizes, facilitates, expands or enforces human rights violations in a country, based on the country context.

Extent of Involvement

Looks at the number of high-risk countries a company is involved in to determine the overall impact a company might have on human rights globally.

Company Management

Assesses a company’s preparedness to prevent and/or mitigate adverse human rights impacts in line with the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights and the local context in which it operates.

Coverage in 15 Countries and Disputed Territories



Central African Republic, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Libya, North Korea, Saudi Arabia, Somalia, South Sudan, Sudan, Syria, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan.


Disputed Territories

Palestine, Western Sahara and Tibet

Sustainalytics does not take a position on the definition or politics of disputed territories.

Issues by Country

Sustainalytics’ proprietary methodology for the Human Rights Radar was developed with input and feedback from various stakeholders. In particular, our gratitude goes out to our valued client Wespath.

Why Sustainalytics?


A Single Market Standard

Consistent approach to ESG assessments across the investment spectrum.


Award-Winning Research and Data

Firm recognized as Best ESG Research and Data Provider by Environmental Finance and Investment Week.


End-to-End ESG Solutions

ESG products and services that serve the entire investment value chain.


25+ Years ESG Expertise

350+ ESG research analysts across our global offices.


Largest Second-Party Opinion Provider

As recognized by Environmental Finance and the Climate Bonds Initiative.

Related Insights and Resources

construction industry protocol

ESG Investors Consider Socioeconomic Impacts of COVID-19 in the Construction Industry

The construction industry can have a reputation for workforce insensitivity and is highly vulnerable to economic and social variabilities. The ESG Impacts of COVID-19 drive companies to adapt to significant challenges related to the demand for construction services. This construction sector research snapshot highlights relevant social issues that corporations face due to ripple effects from the pandemic using Sustainalytics’ ESG Risk Ratings and Controversies Research.

Sustainalytics Weighs in on EU Taxonomy’s State of Flux

Delays, Questions and Confusion: Updates on the EU’s Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation

In this blog, we look at the delay of the level 2 regulation, some aspects of the Q&A, and the ongoing confusion and divergence around SFDR. We pay special attention to the potential impact of the Principle Adverse Impact indicators, an element of SFDR.

EU Taxonomy Developments and the EU’s Renewed Sustainable Finance Strategy

On July 6th, the European Commission published its Strategy for Financing the Transition to a Sustainable Economy, the successor of the EU’s Sustainable Finance Action Plan, which launched in 2018. The strategy focuses on transforming the financial system and financing transition plans, building on the 2018 Action Plan, which centered on developing the EU Taxonomy, putting in place disclosure regimes, and developing tools for the market to develop sustainable investment solutions and prevent greenwashing.

EU Taxonomy Update

Sustainalytics Weighs in on EU Taxonomy’s State of Flux

On May 7th, the European Commission published draft rules on how corporates and financial institutions should report on their alignment with the EU Taxonomy. The draft rules are laid out in a very technical document and not an easy read. This might explain why certain changes with significant impact on timelines and scope of the EU Taxonomy Regulation have flown under the radar of media and investors. Some of the impacts even escaped the attention of financial market participants responding to the consultation on the rules.

Related Products 


Defense Research

Create a robust defense policy with our Controversial Weapons Radar and Arms Trade Research. 

Learn More
norms based screening

Global Standards Screening

Identify companies in breach of the UN Global Compact to support your norms-based screening strategy.

Learn More

Global Standards Engagement

Engage with companies that breach international norms and standards as identified by our Global Standards Screening research.

>Learn More