The EU Taxonomy is a leading science-based classification system expected to become the global standard for determining whether an economic activity can be considered environmentally sustainable.
The EU is developing a set of regulatory reporting requirements that all EU funds with a sustainability objective have to comply with. Beyond these reporting requirements that are still being finalized, investors globally are looking to the framework to support their approach to sustainable investing and to report on the funds’ impact, regardless of where these funds may be situated.
Learn more about how our Sustainalytics’ EU Taxonomy Solution, which provides investors with granular information on companies’ alignment to the EU Taxonomy’s Climate Mitigation objective.
An Overview of the EU Taxonomy
One of the cornerstones of the EU Sustainable Finance Action Plan is to bring clarity to the market regarding which economic activities can be considered sustainable with the aim of encouraging sustainable investing and preventing greenwashing. The EU Taxonomy is an ambitious attempt to define these activities and the related technical standards for six environmental objectives (see diagram).
Sustainalytics’ EU Taxonomy Solution assesses companies’ alignment to the Climate Change Mitigation objective, supplementing reporting data with sophisticated estimation and proxy approaches to give a more holistic picture of a company’s overall alignment where reporting is limited. It will evolve to cover changes in the regulatory requirements as well as the additional environmental objectives when the relevant standards are defined or, in the case of Climate Change Adaptation, when sufficient data becomes available to build reliable models.
Key Features and Benefits
High Quality Research and Reputable Research Partner
The EU Taxonomy Solution builds on our existing suite of well-established ESG and controversies research products.
Holistic View of Alignment
Sustainalytics supplements reported company data with sophisticated estimation and proxy approaches to give a better overview of a company’s overall alignment, enabling investors to move beyond the regulatory requirements.
We will cover more than 12,000 companies across 80+ Taxonomy activities by the end of 2021.
In 2020, we strengthened our existing research capabilities by hiring more than 40 additional analysts that are dedicated to EU Taxonomy research.
Intuitive Online Company Profiles
The research is available in Global Access where users can see granular insights in each issuer’s involvement activities.
Portfolio and Fund Expertise
Now part of Morningstar, we are co-developing the solution from the start to ensure alignment and to leverage Morningstar’s fund/portfolio capabilities.
EU Taxonomy Activity-Based Research Framework
The EU Taxonomy introduces a new approach to assessing sustainability that focuses on economic activities.
Determine whether the company is involved in activities that could make a Substantial Contribution to the EU Taxonomy’s Climate Change Mitigation objective. These activities are based on the EU’s NACE Classification system.
Example: A company involved in the construction of buildings could contribute to climate change mitigation through the construction of green buildings.
Assess the eligible activities against the EU’s technical screening criteria to determine what percentage of these activities meets or exceeds the minimum threshold to classify as make a substantial contribution.
Example: Assess the construction company’s green building activities against the EU Taxonomy’s technical criteria for the “Manufacture of low carbon technologies – Green buildings”.
For an economic activity to be aligned to one of the environmental objectives of the EU Taxonomy, in this case Climate Change Mitigation objective, it is not sufficient to meet the technical screening criteria for that objective. It is also important to ensure that through the pursuit of this activity, the company does not detrimentally affect the other five environmental objectives.
Example: For the company to make a positive contribution through the construction green buildings, it must do so in a responsible way so it does not harm the other environmental objectives, such the EU’s objective of Pollution Prevention and Control.
Make sure the company operates in a responsible way and has Minimum Safeguards in place to avoid negatively impacting societal stakeholders. Sustainalyitcs assesses whether the company operates in a way that complies with global standards for responsible business, including the UN’s Global Compact Principles and OECD’s Guidelines for Multinationals
Example: If the company is building new buildings in a “green fields” project, is it being done in a way that respects the local community’s rights, does it get the right permits without instances of bribery and corruption?
The report shows alignment data in terms of revenue from products and services, investment measured by capital expenditure (CapEx) and in terms of its operational expenditure (OpEx).
For Revenue, CapEx and OpEx, it shows the percentage of activities that are aligned, that are not aligned and that are not eligible. These overviews differentiate between reported data and estimated data. Aligned activities are broken down by “own contribution”, “Enabling”, and “Transition” activities. For not aligned activities the reason is given. In other words, whether it is the “Minimum Standards”, “Do No Significant Harm” or “Technical Screening” criteria that are not being met.
For Revenue, CapEx and OpEx, it shows an overview of all the underlying activities and corresponding data on eligible revenues (%), Alignment (%), Substantial Contribution Type, and Do No Significant Harm screening criteria.
Deep dive into individual contributing activities with an overview of relevant criteria and a qualitative analysis of the activities’ contribution.
Investor Use Cases
Portfolio Management and Reporting
- Report on portfolio alignment to EU Taxonomy framework and underlying criteria. The solution will evolve to fully cover regulatory reporting requirements should these diverge from the scientific framework.
- Manage or improve Taxonomy alignment of portfolios on an ongoing basis.
Leverage the research in your discussions with issuers when there is an indication of non-compliance with DNSH or MS criteria or data gaps related to SC criteria.
Product and Fund Construction
Consider Taxonomy alignment in the construction and management of ESG & impact funds that focus on climate change.
Create compliant investment universes by screening out companies that do not meet DNSH or MS criteria.
The company reports can be accessed via Global Access with user-friendly online tools.
The research can be accessed as an Excel delivery or data file with three different data packages showing increasingly granular information.
A Single Market Standard
Consistent approach to ESG assessments across the investment spectrum.
Award-Winning Research and Data
Firm recognized as Best ESG Research and Data Provider by Environmental Finance and Investment Week.
End-to-End ESG Solutions
ESG products and services that serve the entire investment value chain.
30 Years of ESG Expertise
500+ ESG research analysts across our global offices.
A Leading SPO Provider
As recognized by Environmental Finance and the Climate Bonds Initiative.
Related Insights and Resources
EU Action Planning: ESMA Questions and MiFID Data begs Further SFDR Clarity for Investors
Regulators asking questions about topics central to the EU Action Plan show that more work needs to happen to make this ambitious, first-of-a-kind sustainable finance legislation workable for the market and supervisors and more useful for end investors.
Applying Business and Human Rights International Standards to Investor Due Diligence
Socially conscious ESG investors are interested in how to implement international business and human rights norms in their portfolios and understand the potential impacts of applying additional screening criteria within their strategy.
Sustainable Investment Calculations Under MiFID II and SFDR Remain Perplexing for ESG Investors
The various interpretations of the sustainable investment definition introduced by the SFDR and leveraged in MiFID II leave many market participants unsettled, having to decide between approaches that have different benefits and limitations in the short to medium term.
The Governance of Autonomous Weapons: What Investors Should Know
The ethical implications of lethal autonomous weapons systems (LAWS), often referred to by their dramatic moniker ‘killer robots’, have long been a topic of interest. Until recently, debates about LAWS were relegated as hypothetical, with the technology assumed to be under development and out of reach. Such assumptions may be due for reevaluation, and while a firm conclusion is yet to be drawn, it is worthwhile presenting them to the ESG investment community.
Measure, manage and report on the social and environmental impact of your portfolio.
Leverage our carbon research to align your portfolio to the future low-carbon economy.