Heimstaden Bostad AB
Industry Group: Real Estate
ESG Risk Rating
Industry Group (1st = lowest risk)
Real Estate 20 out of 1045
Global Universe 67 out of 15620
What are the ESG Risk Ratings?
Notice: The information is provided as is, for informational, non-commercial purposes only, does not constitute investment advice and is subject to conditions available in our Legal Disclaimer. Usage of this information is not permitted in any way, unless otherwise agreed in writing. By way of exception, usage of this information is permitted to the rated subject, limited to a single reference to the score on the rated subject’s sustainability webpage or CSR report, mentioning Sustainalytics as a source.
For corporate professionals interested in direct competitor insights
Sustainalytics' Peer Performance Insights gives an in-depth analysis of your company's ESG strengths and weaknesses compared to your competitors and industry performance. These insights can be used to identify areas of ESG improvement to help inform future management decisions that align with your organization's sustainability goals.
Our Approach to Calculating ESG Risk
The ESG Risk Ratings measure a company's exposure to industry-specific material ESG risks and how well a company is managing those risks.
Exposure refers to the extent to which a company is exposed to different material ESG issues. Our exposure score takes into consideration subindustry and company-specific factors such as its business model.
Heimstaden Bostad AB's Exposure is Low
Management refers to how well a company is managing its relevant ESG issues. Our management score assesses the robustness of a company's ESG programs, practices and policies.
Heimstaden Bostad AB's Management of ESG Material Risk is Strong
How do the ESG Risk Ratings work?
Top Material ESG Issues for Heimstaden Bostad AB
Understand how exposed companies are to specific material ESG issues and how well companies are managing these issues.
Highest Controversy level that has impacted Heimstaden Bostad AB's ESG Risk Rating in the last three years
Highest Controversy Level