ESG Voting Policy Overlay

Align voting to ESG principles, research & engagement

null

New regulations and stakeholder pressure are creating the need for investors to demonstrate their commitment as responsible owners that view corporate accountability as a means of achieving greater long-term value. In Europe, the Shareholder Rights Directive II requires transparency around voting and engagement and, in North America, voting is considered part of investors’ fiduciary duty with engagement being a natural extension of voting proxies. This underscores the benefit of aligning voting and engagement activities.

Sustainalytics’ ESG Voting Policy Overlay supports a holistic approach to stewardship by providing voting recommendations that are based on:

null

ESG Principles & Sustainability Signals

Our policy overlay is designed to provide investors with expert guidance on ESG focused shareholder resolutions and management proposals, looking beyond traditional corporate governance measures to align with Sustainalytics ESG Principles or the SDGs.

null

Investor Driven Research Signals

Based on the previous proxy season’s proposals and votes, we identify ESG topics that have strong support among investors. Sustainalytics’ ESG Risk Ratings are then used to identify companies where the management of these issues is assessed as weak.

null

Engagement Signals

As part of our Engagement Services, we explore all avenues of stewardship with a focus on constructive dialogue. An issuer’s willingness to engage and authentically work toward change objectives that are in the best interest of shareholders is a cornerstone of the vote recommendations driven by our policy guidelines.

 

Key Features and Benefits

null

Comply with Stewardship Responsibilities

Choose your level of participation and where to focus your own efforts while leveraging Sustainalytics’ support to meet stewardship responsibilities and comply with relevant regulation.

null

Holistic Stewardship Strategy

Seamlessly align voting and engagement activities to shared investor concerns, robust ESG principles and the latest ESG research.

Use Cases

null

1. Portfolio Management

Voting seeks to influence corporate behavior in clients’ holdings and the societies in which they operate.

null

2. ESG Integration

Voting on research signals enables fuller ESG integration and aligns messages across different products.

null

3. Shareholder Collaboration

By voting in alignment with Sustainalytics research and principles, clients will, together with likeminded peers, collaboratively advance their sustainability agendas.

null

4. Stewardship

Voting demonstrates a commitment to be a responsible shareholder.

null

5. Fiduciary Duty

Engaging with high risk portfolio companies is a key element of stewardship codes and guidelines for responsible investors, such as EU Action Plan on Sustainable Finance on Long Term Shareholder Engagement, the EU Shareholder Rights Directive II and more.

null

6. Engagement

Voting supports engagements, which address material ESG issues that may end up on companies’ AGM agendas.

Deliverables

Voting recommendations

Post-AGM report on Engagement and Voting Activities

Sustainalytics’ mission is to provide the insights required for investors and companies to make better informed decisions that lead to a more just and sustainable global economy. We believe that when investors and companies embrace ESG meaningfully, it will create long-term value that benefits all stakeholders, including shareholders. The cornerstone hereof is mutual trust, which is built on transparency. We have captured these values in a set of principles that are aligned to widely accepted norms, standards and sustainability objectives. For more information, please see Sustainalytics' ESG principles.

Sustainalytics’ ESG Voting Policy Overlay is intended to work in tandem with traditional corporate governance voting policies, supplementing it with guidance, analyses and recommendations on ESG topics. It can be used in combination with clients’ own policies or that of a third-party policy and provider. With regards to corporate governance voting items, Sustainalytics supports the International Corporate Governance Network’s (ICGN) Global Stewardship Principles and Global Governance Principles as overarching guidelines on best practice.

Why Sustainalytics?

null

A Single Market Standard

Consistent approach to ESG assessments across the investment spectrum.

null

Award-Winning Research and Data

Firm recognized as Best ESG Research and Data Provider by Environmental Finance and Investment Week.

null

End-to-End ESG Solutions

ESG products and services that serve the entire investment value chain.

null

25+ Years ESG Expertise

350+ ESG research analysts across our global offices.

null

Largest Second-Party Opinion Provider

As recognized by Environmental Finance and the Climate Bonds Initiative.

Related Insights and Resources

ESG interconnected

Using Systems Thinking to Avoid ESG Investing Blind Spots

For investors looking to enhance ESG risk management and the long-term impact of sustainability efforts, a systemic approach can help identify interventions that will most effectively mitigate the risk of negative outcomes or divert the chain of events towards a more sustainable trajectory. Typically, this involves moving from single-issue or company-specific tactics to progressively integrate system-level considerations in ESG strategies. Targeting systemic change through active ownership is one way to acknowledge and start unravelling the dynamic web of global challenges.

climate litigation Netherlands

What Climate Litigation Means for the Oil & Gas Industry

As the global economy looks towards recovery after being impacted by the pandemic, the oil and gas industry faces a growing wave of shareholder activism and climate litigation due to a heightened focus on an accelerated transition as an indirect impact of the pandemic – painting an increasingly bleak picture for those within the industry.

Drill in ocean

Royal Dutch Shell Court Order Shifts Paradigm for Corporate ESG Accountability

On 26 May 2021, the Court of The Hague orders Royal Dutch Shell (RDS) to reduce CO2 emissions to a net 45% by the end of 2030 compared to 2019 through the Group Policy of the Shell Group. The order of a national (Dutch) court demands that a global company (RDS) fulfills its obligations under the Paris Climate Agreement, although RDS was not a party in that agreement, and there is no legal equivalent in The Netherlands. What are the broader consequences of this order, also globally and for other companies and potentially also other jurisdictions?

office social distance

Banks Embrace Corporate Culture as Change Agent

Corporate culture is not automatically positive, and elements of a company’s culture may provide certain benefits or disadvantages to a firm’s competitiveness. When acknowledged, corporate culture can be used as a tool to drive better business outcomes and manage conduct and compliance risk. Our discussions with companies show that corporate culture can have a dominant effect and influence behaviour over and beyond stated company policies and programs.

Related Solutions

Thematic Engagement

Engage on the most challenging ESG issues, from climate change to human capital. 

Learn More

Material Risk Engagement

Engage on the most material ESG risks identified by the ESG Risk Ratings. 

Learn More

Global Standards Engagement

Engage with companies that breach international norms and standards as identified by our Global Standards Screening research. 

Learn More