ESG Voting Policy Overlay

Align voting to ESG principles, research & engagement

null

New regulations and stakeholder pressure are creating the need for investors to demonstrate their commitment as responsible owners that view corporate accountability as a means of achieving greater long-term value. In Europe, the Shareholder Rights Directive II requires transparency around voting and engagement and, in North America, voting is considered part of investors’ fiduciary duty with engagement being a natural extension of voting proxies. This underscores the benefit of aligning voting and engagement activities.

 

UK stewardship code logo

Sustainalytics’ ESG Voting Policy Overlay supports a holistic approach to stewardship by providing voting recommendations that are based on:

null

ESG Principles & Sustainability Signals

Our policy overlay is designed to provide investors with expert guidance on ESG focused shareholder resolutions and management proposals, looking beyond traditional corporate governance measures to align with Sustainalytics ESG Principles or the SDGs.

null

Investor Driven Research Signals

Based on the previous proxy season’s proposals and votes, we identify ESG topics that have strong support among investors. Sustainalytics’ ESG Risk Ratings are then used to identify companies where the management of these issues is assessed as weak.

null

Engagement Signals

As part of our Engagement Services, we explore all avenues of stewardship with a focus on constructive dialogue. An issuer’s willingness to engage and authentically work toward change objectives that are in the best interest of shareholders is a cornerstone of the vote recommendations driven by our policy guidelines.

 

Key Features and Benefits

null

Comply with Stewardship Responsibilities

Choose your level of participation and where to focus your own efforts while leveraging Sustainalytics’ support to meet stewardship responsibilities and comply with relevant regulation.

null

Holistic Stewardship Strategy

Seamlessly align voting and engagement activities to shared investor concerns, robust ESG principles and the latest ESG research.

Use Cases

null

1. Portfolio Management

Voting seeks to influence corporate behavior in clients’ holdings and the societies in which they operate.

null

2. ESG Integration

Voting on research signals enables fuller ESG integration and aligns messages across different products.

null

3. Shareholder Collaboration

By voting in alignment with Sustainalytics research and principles, clients will, together with likeminded peers, collaboratively advance their sustainability agendas.

null

4. Stewardship

Voting demonstrates a commitment to be a responsible shareholder.

null

5. Fiduciary Duty

Engaging with high risk portfolio companies is a key element of stewardship codes and guidelines for responsible investors, such as EU Action Plan on Sustainable Finance on Long Term Shareholder Engagement, the EU Shareholder Rights Directive II and more.

null

6. Engagement

Voting supports engagements, which address material ESG issues that may end up on companies’ AGM agendas.

Deliverables

Voting recommendations

Post-AGM report on Engagement and Voting Activities

Sustainalytics’ mission is to provide the insights required for investors and companies to make better informed decisions that lead to a more just and sustainable global economy. We believe that when investors and companies embrace ESG meaningfully, it will create long-term value that benefits all stakeholders, including shareholders. The cornerstone hereof is mutual trust, which is built on transparency. We have captured these values in a set of principles that are aligned to widely accepted norms, standards and sustainability objectives. For more information, please see Sustainalytics' ESG principles.

Sustainalytics’ ESG Voting Policy Overlay is intended to work in tandem with traditional corporate governance voting policies, supplementing it with guidance, analyses and recommendations on ESG topics. It can be used in combination with clients’ own policies or that of a third-party policy and provider. With regards to corporate governance voting items, Sustainalytics supports the International Corporate Governance Network’s (ICGN) Global Stewardship Principles and Global Governance Principles as overarching guidelines on best practice.

Why Sustainalytics?

null

A Single Market Standard

Consistent approach to ESG assessments across the investment spectrum.

null

Award-Winning Research and Data

Firm recognized as Best ESG Research and Data Provider by Environmental Finance and Investment Week.

null

End-to-End ESG Solutions

ESG products and services that serve the entire investment value chain.

null

25+ Years ESG Expertise

350+ ESG research analysts across our global offices.

null

Largest Second-Party Opinion Provider

As recognized by Environmental Finance and the Climate Bonds Initiative.

Related Insights and Resources

The circular way forward could be the key to reducing food waste

Indications that a food crisis is imminent are clear. Fundamental changes in the global food system are required to address these challenges. This decade is a watershed moment for urgent efforts to close the loop, and companies and investors can play a pivotal role. Despite being closely connected to issues such as climate change and basic human rights, food waste has attracted comparatively less attention from companies, investors, and other stakeholders.

UK stewardship code cover

UK Stewardship Code 2020 - Stewardship Report

Sustainalytics, a Morningstar Company, has been accepted as a signatory of the UK Stewardship Code 2020 (the Code) by the Financial Reporting Council (FRC). Download the report to review how Sustainalytics' commitment to high stewardship standards meets the service provider principles set under the Financial Reporting Council’s revised Code.

Responsible Investing

Recent market trends put engagement and voting front and centre for responsible investors

From a market perspective, engagement and voting on governance issues have been used as levers for influence for a long time. On the other hand, environmental and social issues were historically addressed from a values-based perspective or primarily for fact-finding purposes. Today, many responsible investors leverage corporate dialogue as a tool to influence and drive meaningful change and impact

North American Material Risk Engagement Trends: ESG Reporting Frameworks, Emission Reduction Targets and Beyond

There are many factors that rating agencies consider within its overall assessment. For example, ESG rating companies tend to look for at least three years of ESG metrics to determine company trends and long-term ESG targets, goals, and strategies to manage and reduce ESG risks at least five years ahead. Read on to learn about how Sustainalytics' Material Risk Engagement program promotes and protects long-term value by engaging with high-risk companies on financially-material ESG issues. (A North American Snapshot)

Related Solutions

null

Thematic Engagement

Engage on the most challenging ESG issues, from climate change to human capital. 

Learn More
null

Material Risk Engagement

Engage on the most material ESG risks identified by the ESG Risk Ratings. 

Learn More
null

Global Standards Engagement

Engage with companies that breach international norms and standards as identified by our Global Standards Screening research. 

Learn More