ESG Risk Ratings

A consistent approach to assess material ESG risk

null

Knowing how exposed and how well your portfolio companies manage their material ESG issues is now a critical part of making well-informed investment decisions.

That's why the world's leading investors rely on our ESG research and ratings for a consistent approach to evaluate financially material ESG issues that affect the long-term performance of their investments.

Learn more about why Sustainalytics’ ESG Research and Ratings are the industry standard.

Overview of Sustainalytics’ ESG Risk Ratings

Sustainalytics’ ESG Risk Ratings measure a company’s exposure to industry-specific material ESG risks and how well a company is managing those risks. This multi-dimensional way of measuring ESG risk combines the concepts of management and exposure to arrive at an absolute assessment of ESG risk. We identify five categories of ESG risk severity that could impact a company’s enterprise value

Risk rating scale

The Rigor and Comprehensiveness that the World’s Leading Investors Count On

null

Absolute Measure of ESG Risk

A sophisticated methodology for rating absolute ESG risk, while enabling best-in-class analysis. Company ratings are comparable across peers and subindustries and allow for easy aggregation at the portfolio level.

null

Multiple Exposure Factors

Deep insights from multiple exposure factors, including business model, financial strength, geography and incident history.

null

Integrated Corporate Governance Information

Fully integrated, comprehensive corporate governance research and ratings.

null

Transparent Methodology

Transparent methodology with multiple levels of data and qualitative insights to provide clients with custom ESG solutions.

null

Two-Dimensional Materiality Framework

Two-dimensional materiality framework measures a company’s exposure to industry-specific material risks and how well a company is managing those risks.

null

Three Central Building Blocks

Corporate governance, material ESG issues, and idiosyncratic issues (black swans) form the three central building blocks of our ESG research and ratings.

null

Five Risk Levels

The ESG Risk Ratings are categorized across five risk levels: negligible (0-10), low (10-20), medium (20-30), high (30-40) and severe (40+).

null

13,000+ Companies Covered

Sustainalytics' ESG Research and Ratings span more than 13,000 companies and encompass most major global indices.

Material ESG issues

20 Material ESG Issues

The ratings framework is supported by 20 material ESG issues that are underpinned by more than 300 indicators and 1,300 data points.

Accessibility

Flexible Accessibility

The ESG Risk Ratings are available through Global Access, Datafeeds and API as well as several third-party distribution platforms.

Human Insights Supported by AI Efficiency

null

Daily News Monitoring

AI-powered Digital Content Curation
Research analysts leverage smart technologies to enable them to monitor more than 60,000 media sources, and up to one million news articles daily.

annual update cycle

Robust Annual Update Cycle

  • Company profiles updated annually with corporate reporting cycle
  • Alternative data sources, like regulatory filings on product recalls and NGO sources, augment self-reported corporate data
  • Analysis by a team of over 350 ESG research analysts supported by artificial intelligence powered descriptive and predictive analytic capabilities
  • Robust quality control mechanisms with peer reviews by senior analysts and company feedback mechanisms

About Our Framework

We start with exposure, where exposure to each material ESG issue is initially determined at the subindustry level.
Next, we consider what part of the company’s risk can effectively be managed through ESG programs and policies.
For some companies, a portion of its risk may be considered unmanageable. For example, an oil company is not able to fully eliminate all its risks related to carbon emissions so that is factored out of the calculation.
For the portion of risk that is manageable, a company’s performance is reflected by its policies, programs, practices and quantitative performance measures.
The management gap reflects the risk that is not managed. In addition, controversies have a discounting effect on the company’s management score as they demonstrate shortcomings in the company’s programs and policies.
Overall a company’s ESG Risk Rating is calculated by adding the amount of unmanaged risk for each material ESG issue.

Investor Use Cases 

null

ESG Integration

Multi-dimensional ESG risk scores can be incorporated into equity or bond valuation models and aggregated at the portfolio-level.

null

Best-in-Class Investment Analysis

Comparable company scores support flexible applications for best-in-class analysis, including subindustry, sector or regional approaches.

null

Screening and Benchmarking

Overall Risk Ratings and material ESG issue scores support risk-based ESG screens and enable robust benchmarking across and within sectors and subindustries.

null

Thematic Investing

Scores on material ESG issues support thematic investment themes and provide meaningful new input for fund and index creation.

null

Engagement and Voting

Material ESG issue framework effectively supports engagement with companies on priority ESG issues and informs voting decisions on E&S shareholder resolutions.

null

Reporting & Promotion

Communicate sustainability performance and commitment through ESG reporting and leverage the Morningstar Sustainability RatingTM for funds for marketing purposes.

Report Insights

Company ratings are categorized across five risk levels: negligible, low, medium, high and severe.

ESG Risk ratings report showcasing company rating

A company’s risk is measured against its industry peers and against the global universe.

ESG Risk ratings report showcasing company risk

Qualitative analysis, underpinned by analyst insights and quantitative data, describes the reasons why a company is exposed to specific material ESG issues and explains how well a company is managing these issues.

ESG Risk ratings report showcasing company analysis

Material ESG Issues (MEIs) are identified and brought into focus.

ESG Risk ratings report showcasing material ESG issues

Transparency into company events that may impact a company’s operations, stakeholders or the environment.

ESG Risk ratings report showcasing company events

The magnitude to which a company is exposed to ESG risk and how well the company is managing that risk is measured and explained.

ESG Risk ratings report showcasing ESG risk decomposition
ESG Risk ratings report showcasing company rating

Why Sustainalytics?

null

A Single Market Standard

Consistent approach to ESG assessments across the investment spectrum.

null

Award-Winning Research and Data

Firm recognized as Best ESG Research and Data Provider by Environmental Finance and Investment Week.

null

End-to-End ESG Solutions

ESG products and services that serve the entire investment value chain.

null

25+ Years ESG Expertise

350+ ESG research analysts across our global offices.

null

Largest Second-Party Opinion Provider

As recognized by Environmental Finance and the Climate Bonds Initiative.

Climate Solutions

Leverage our carbon research to align your portfolio to the future low-carbon economy.

Learn More

Thematic Engagement

Engage on the most challenging ESG issues, from climate change to human capital.

Learn More

Impact Solutions

Measure, manage and report on the social and environmental impact of your portfolio.

Learn More

Morningstar® Global Market SustainabilitySM Index Family

Best-in-class equity index that features reduced ESG risk profile​ with low to moderate tracking error.

Morningstar® Sustainability Dividend Yield FocusSM Index Family

High Income generating equity investments focused on total returns with reduced ESG Risk.

Morningstar® Global Corporate Bond Sustainability IndexesSM

Diversified corporate bond portfolio that avoids bonds with high ESG risk relative to their sector peers.

Morningstar® Sustainability Moat IndexesSM

Exposure to companies that have distinct competitive advantages as well as low ESG Risk.

Related Insights and Resources

covid-19 vaccine storage dry ice

ESG Risk Exposure from COVID-19 Vaccine Transportation and Distribution

As mass vaccination against the coronavirus started, a key challenge has been to keep millions of doses of vaccines at the right temperature. An increase in temperature inside a truck or aircraft, by half a degree, for half an hour, would reportedly result in a 'defrosted' vaccine which has then to be discarded.

climate litigation Netherlands

What Climate Litigation Means for the Oil & Gas Industry

As the global economy looks towards recovery after being impacted by the pandemic, the oil and gas industry faces a growing wave of shareholder activism and climate litigation due to a heightened focus on an accelerated transition as an indirect impact of the pandemic – painting an increasingly bleak picture for those within the industry.

indonesia

ESG Disclosure and Performance in Southeast Asia

Strategically located at the centre of Asia Pacific, with a young population of more than 675 million across 11 countries, Southeast Asia is an economic block with one of the world’s fastest GDP growth rate. In recent years, the region has been attracting the attention of global investors. At the same time, in the context of responsible investing moving from a niche activity to the mainstream, research on the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance of Southeast Asia companies is limited. In this article, we have a deeper look at the ESG disclosure and performance of major Southeast Asia countries, focusing on the ASEAN-6 countries (Singapore, Malaysia, Thailand, Vietnam, Indonesia, and the Philippines).

Unwritten Risks – The True Costs of Mispriced Climate Change

Research shows that Property & Casualty insurance underwriters are not accurately pricing climate risks, and US government policy and program decisions are proving to be unsustainable. In our most recent blog, Justin Cheng talks about the resulting premium pricing corrections in the wake of intensifying extreme weather events. With this trend, a significant number of US homeowners are unable to obtain property insurance while taxpayers take on the increased cost of climate risk.