Global Standards Screening

Identify companies that violate international standards

null

Norms-based investment strategies represent an enormous market opportunity for investors with $4,7 trillion in assets, according to the GSIA. This strategy is likely to benefit from regulatory tailwinds driven by initiatives such as the EU’s Sustainable Finance Action Plan, which incorporates normative criteria in its requirements.

Sustainalytics’ Global Standards Screening assesses companies’ impact on stakeholders and the extent to which a company causes, contributes or is linked to violations of international norms and standards. Our research provides assessments covering the UN’s Global Compact Principles, International Labour Organization’s (ILO) Conventions, OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises and the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs). Beyond the market opportunity and compliance requirements, investors can leverage this strategy to proactively manage reputational risks.

Global Standards Engagement provides an active ownership overlay for clients who wish to align their stewardship activities to global standards.

Global Standards Screening Introduction

Daily Screening

700,000+

News items

60,000

NGO and media sources

25,000+

Companies

Key Benefits

null

Improve Reputational Risk Management

Enhance your portfolio’s long-term performance by proactively identifying and managing business conduct related risks.

null

Ensure your Portfolio Complies with International Norms and Standards

Identify companies that violate the Global Compact’s internationally recognized principles for business conduct and align your portfolio holdings to these standards.

null

Respond to Responsible Investment Mandates

Expand your product suite to cover the fourth-largest responsible investment strategy and respond to relevant client mandates.

null

Gain an In-depth Understanding of Incidents

Access qualitative analyses of incidents that consider the company’s accountability, the severity of its impact and the quality of management’s response.

Report Insights

Company is classified as Compliant, Watchlist, or Non-compliant.

human rights report

A Positive, Negative or Neutral outlook is provided based on our assessment of whether we expect an improvement or a deterioration in the assessment status.

human rights report

Detailed information about the Principle(s) violated, or at risk of being violated.

human rights report

Company is analyzed and assessed according to the following framework: Severity of impact, company responsibility, and company management.

human rights report
human rights report showcasing classification

How it Works

null

1. We screen 700,000+ news items from 60,000 media and NGO sources daily to identify relevant news.

null

2. News items are assessed and classified by a dedicated incidents team.

null

3. Incidents are then analyzed on case and company-level and an assessment is made against the relevant Global Compact principle(s) with a forward-looking outlook.

null

4. An oversight committee consisting of senior representatives from Research, Product Management, Engagement Services and Quality Control reviews and approves all assessments.

null

5. Only after company contact regarding an allegation and an oversight committee’s evaluation a company is classified as Watchlist or Non-compliant.

null

6. Clients can access company profiles via the online platform in addition to receiving a quarterly update report.

Assessment Example

Example of Non-compliant assessment: Company ABC, a pharmaceutical company

    null

    Assessment:

    In violation of UN Global Compact Principle 1 (Businesses should support and respect the protection of internationally proclaimed human rights)

    null

    Framework:

    • Severity of Impact: Company ABC’s pricing model in the US has had a significant negative impact on patients through increased insurance premiums or reduced insurance coverage, depriving patients of much-needed treatments in the absence of viable alternatives
    • Company Responsibility: The US authorities criticized company ABC’s business model as it was largely focused on making strategic acquisitions to establish price hikes for medication. This practice is exceptional compared to all its industry peers
    • Company Management: Company ABC’s former CEO admitted that the company had been too aggressive in raising the prices of some of its drugs. On the other hand, the US authorities have accused the company of withholding documents requested, related to its pricing. This lack of transparency does not give us confidence in its ability to manage the risks associated with this issue

    About Global Compact

    The UN Global Compact is the world’s largest principles-based voluntary initiative consisting of over 16,000 companies from 166 countries. UN Global Compact signatories commit to universally-accepted principles on human rights, labor, environmental protection and anti-corruption.

    Principle 1

    Businesses should support and respect the protection of internationally proclaimed human rights; and

    Principle 2

    Make sure that they are not complicit in human rights abuses.

    Principle 3

    Businesses should uphold the freedom of association and the effective recognition of the right to collective bargaining;

    Principle 4

    The elimination of all forms of forced and compulsory labour;

    Principle 5

    The effective abolition of child labour; and

    Principle 6

    The elimination of discrimination in respect of employment and occupation.

    Principle 7

    Businesses should support a precautionary approach to environmental challenges;

    Principle 8

    Undertake initiatives to promote greater environmental responsibility; and

    Principle 9

    Encourage the development and diffusion of environmentally friendly technologies.

    Principle 10

    Businesses should work against corruption in all its forms, including extortion and bribery.

    null

    Demonstrate your Commitment as a Responsible Owner

    Subscribe to Sustainalytics’ Global Standards Engagement to pool resources and let us engage with companies on behalf of you and other investors. Support company engagement with independent, 3rd party normative assessments of business conduct incidents.

    Delivery Options

    global access platform in laptop

    Global Access

    Access our research through our user-friendly investor interface with easy to use screening and reporting tools. You can also access onscreen & PDF reports

    Learn More
    data services icons in desktop computer

    Data Services Regular data feed (SFTP/FTP) or API

    Access our research through an internal or a third-party system of your choice: Bloomberg, Factset and Markit

    Learn More

    Why Sustainalytics?

    null

    A Single Market Standard

    Consistent approach to ESG assessments across the investment spectrum.

    null

    Award-Winning Research and Data

    Firm recognized as Best ESG Research and Data Provider by Environmental Finance and Investment Week.

    null

    End-to-End ESG Solutions

    ESG products and services that serve the entire investment value chain.

    null

    25+ Years ESG Expertise

    350+ ESG research analysts across our global offices.

    null

    Largest Second-Party Opinion Provider

    As recognized by Environmental Finance and the Climate Bonds Initiative.

    null

    Global Standards Engagement

    Engage with companies that breach international norms and standards as identified by our Global Standards Screening research.

    Learn More

    Human Rights Radar

    Identify and understand companies’ involvement in countries and territories where there is a high risk of human rights violations.  

    Learn More
    null

    Defense Research

    Create a robust defense policy with our Controversial Weapons Radar and Arms Trade Research.

    Learn More

    Morningstar® Global Market SustainabilitySM Index Family

    Best-in-class equity index that features reduced ESG risk profile​ with low to moderate tracking error.

    Morningstar® Minority Empowerment IndexSM

    Companies that are committed to racial and ethnic diversity as demonstrated by relevant programs and policies related to diversity, community development etc.

    Related Insights and Resources

    construction industry protocol

    ESG Investors Consider Socioeconomic Impacts of COVID-19 in the Construction Industry

    The construction industry can have a reputation for workforce insensitivity and is highly vulnerable to economic and social variabilities. The ESG Impacts of COVID-19 drive companies to adapt to significant challenges related to the demand for construction services. This construction sector research snapshot highlights relevant social issues that corporations face due to ripple effects from the pandemic using Sustainalytics’ ESG Risk Ratings and Controversies Research.

    Sustainalytics Weighs in on EU Taxonomy’s State of Flux

    Delays, Questions and Confusion: Updates on the EU’s Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation

    In this blog, we look at the delay of the level 2 regulation, some aspects of the Q&A, and the ongoing confusion and divergence around SFDR. We pay special attention to the potential impact of the Principle Adverse Impact indicators, an element of SFDR.

    EU Taxonomy Developments and the EU’s Renewed Sustainable Finance Strategy

    On July 6th, the European Commission published its Strategy for Financing the Transition to a Sustainable Economy, the successor of the EU’s Sustainable Finance Action Plan, which launched in 2018. The strategy focuses on transforming the financial system and financing transition plans, building on the 2018 Action Plan, which centered on developing the EU Taxonomy, putting in place disclosure regimes, and developing tools for the market to develop sustainable investment solutions and prevent greenwashing.

    EU Taxonomy Update

    Sustainalytics Weighs in on EU Taxonomy’s State of Flux

    On May 7th, the European Commission published draft rules on how corporates and financial institutions should report on their alignment with the EU Taxonomy. The draft rules are laid out in a very technical document and not an easy read. This might explain why certain changes with significant impact on timelines and scope of the EU Taxonomy Regulation have flown under the radar of media and investors. Some of the impacts even escaped the attention of financial market participants responding to the consultation on the rules.