International conventions that ban the production and sale of controversial weapons as well as the United Nation’s Arms Trade Treaty are increasingly adopted by national regulators. But even outside of these regulatory regimes, exposure to these types of holdings can result in substantial reputational damage.
Sustainalytics’ Defense Research enables investors to screen companies involved in controversial weapons and arms trade.
The research includes our Controversial Weapons Radar as well as our Arms Trade Research. Controversial Weapons Radar provides research on companies’ involvement in the direct or indirect manufacture, sale or support of controversial weapons, such as cluster munitions and nuclear weapons, while Arms Trade Research provides information on public companies selling arms to sanctioned countries or countries where there is a high risk of violence against civilians.
Latest Insights
ESG Investors Consider Socioeconomic Impacts of COVID-19 in the Construction Industry
.tmb-thumbnl_rc.jpg?sfvrsn=f9fcdf85_1 "european-union-flag-against-parliament-in-brussels-picture-id483074908 (1)")
EU Taxonomy Developments and the EU’s Renewed Sustainable Finance Strategy
Key Benefits
Compliance
Comply with relevant regulations and client mandates and align your portfolio to international treaties
Reputation Management
Manage reputational risk by expanding your Defense and Human Rights policies to cover controversial arms as well as the sale of arms to regimes where there is a high risk of violence against civilians
Deeper Insights
Gain clear oversight of the nature of involvement in controversial weapons and arms trade and dive deeper into the issues with links to supporting sources and references
Analyst Access
Speak directly to our Defense analysts who are able to provide more context and nuance as you dive into the issues
Global Coverage
Controversial Weapons Research
All public and private companies with involvement
Arms Trade
All public companies
Regulatory Drivers
Countries are increasingly signing up to international treaties and regulations that prohibit controversial weapons or restrict arms trade to controversial regimes.
1968
Non-proliferation Treaty
1972
Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention
1997
Chemical Weapons Convention
1999
Anti-personnel Mine Ban Convention
2008
Convention on Cluster Munitions
2014
United Nations’ Arms Trade Treaty
2021
Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons
Controversial Weapons Radar Report Insights
The report provides background information on the involvement of the companies included in the Controversial Weapons Radar such as sources used, estimates of revenues derived from activities in the defense sector, and relevant corporate relationships.
Arms Trade Report Insights
Identify companies that export arms to countries where they are used against civilians or where there is a high risk thereof. Learn about relevant arms embargos, which countries imposed them and read a description of the transaction with links to media sources.
Why Sustainalytics?
A Single Market Standard
Consistent approach to ESG assessments across the investment spectrum.
Award-Winning Research and Data
Firm recognized as Best ESG Research and Data Provider by Environmental Finance and Investment Week.
End-to-End ESG Solutions
ESG products and services that serve the entire investment value chain.
25+ Years ESG Expertise
350+ ESG research analysts across our global offices.
Largest Second-Party Opinion Provider
As recognized by Environmental Finance and the Climate Bonds Initiative.
Related Insights and Resources
ESG Investors Consider Socioeconomic Impacts of COVID-19 in the Construction Industry
The construction industry can have a reputation for workforce insensitivity and is highly vulnerable to economic and social variabilities. The ESG Impacts of COVID-19 drive companies to adapt to significant challenges related to the demand for construction services. This construction sector research snapshot highlights relevant social issues that corporations face due to ripple effects from the pandemic using Sustainalytics’ ESG Risk Ratings and Controversies Research.
Delays, Questions and Confusion: Updates on the EU’s Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation
In this blog, we look at the delay of the level 2 regulation, some aspects of the Q&A, and the ongoing confusion and divergence around SFDR. We pay special attention to the potential impact of the Principle Adverse Impact indicators, an element of SFDR.
EU Taxonomy Developments and the EU’s Renewed Sustainable Finance Strategy
On July 6th, the European Commission published its Strategy for Financing the Transition to a Sustainable Economy, the successor of the EU’s Sustainable Finance Action Plan, which launched in 2018. The strategy focuses on transforming the financial system and financing transition plans, building on the 2018 Action Plan, which centered on developing the EU Taxonomy, putting in place disclosure regimes, and developing tools for the market to develop sustainable investment solutions and prevent greenwashing.
Sustainalytics Weighs in on EU Taxonomy’s State of Flux
On May 7th, the European Commission published draft rules on how corporates and financial institutions should report on their alignment with the EU Taxonomy. The draft rules are laid out in a very technical document and not an easy read. This might explain why certain changes with significant impact on timelines and scope of the EU Taxonomy Regulation have flown under the radar of media and investors. Some of the impacts even escaped the attention of financial market participants responding to the consultation on the rules.
Related Solutions
Controversial Product Involvement
Screen for companies involved in specific product areas, such as tobacco and military contracting.
Human Rights Radar
Identify and understand companies’ involvement in countries and territories where there is a high risk of human rights violations.
Global Standards Screening
Identify companies in breach of the UN Global Compact to support your norms-based screening strategy.