Looking at ESG in Crypto, Blockchain, and Public Equities

Posted on March 30, 2022

Martin Vezér
Martin Vezér
ESG Research Associate Director, Thematic Research

Investors can face risks related to noncompliance with respect to tightening regulations targeting the crypto market. This market also faces challenges related to the energy intensity of crypto mining which can have a large carbon footprint, depending on the sources of energy used in mining. On the other hand, the efficiency of crypto blockchains may have positive social impacts, such as reducing the costs of transactions for people sending remittances. Moreover, some cryptos function without relying on mining operations by using a proof-of-stake rather than proof-of-work consensus mechanism.

Features of blockchain that may support use cases across multiple industries

Blockchain features

Beyond the volatile crypto market, blockchain has several features that lend well to commercial applications. Blockchain can help improve the transparency, speed and efficiency of data transfers and monetary transactions. Businesses in multiple industries are using blockchain tools to enhance payment platforms and secure supply chain management systems.

Sustainalytics’ latest Thematic Research report, An ESG Lens on Blockchain and Public Equities, surveys environmental, social and governance (ESG) risks and opportunities related to applications of blockchain technology that are being developed by listed companies across multiple sectors of the economy.

Report Structure

ESG Blockchain Report

The report has three main parts. The first section provides a primer on blockchain, crypto and related ESG issues. The second section focuses on a sample of 10 blockchain themed exchange traded funds (ETFs). The third section assesses companies on relevant ESG criteria and compares a selection of industry peers developing blockchain tools.

ETF analysis

Discussions about ESG issues linked to blockchain have tended to focus on crypto, but other aspects of this technology present different risks and opportunities. To identify ESG issues related to blockchain applications in the public equities market, our analysis starts by looking at 10 blockchain-themed ETFs.

We combine 144 constituents of these ETFs that are covered by our comprehensive ESG Risk Ratings into a model fund of funds (FOF) and assess its ESG characteristics relative to the Morningstar Global Markets (Gbl Mrkts) Large-Mid index.

As shown in the chart below, we find that our model FOF faces higher levels of unmanaged risk in areas that are critical for companies developing blockchain applications. Compared to the index, the weighted risk scores of the model FOF are 9% higher on Business Ethics, 17% higher Human Capital and 71% higher in Data Privacy and Security. We attribute the outsized unmanaged risk of the FOF on these issues to its high concentration of companies in the Information Technology and Financials sectors, which face high levels of exposure to the issues. These Material ESG Issues (MEIs) may constitute an area of interest for investors in this space to assess and engage with companies.

Material ESG Issue risks, blockchain model FOF vs Morningstar Global Markets Large-Mid Cap index

Industry analysis

Our analysis of blockchain applications in different sectors identifies four key areas of research that investors in this space can integrate into their portfolio, engagement, and financing strategies.

1. Financials companies sampled from our model blockchain FOF tend to face high levels of unmanaged risk on two MEIs: Product Governance and Business Ethics

2. Human Capital and Data Privacy and Security are critical MEIs for companies developing blockchain tools to support business activities across multiple sectors. Companies in the Conglomerates and Software and Services industries are highly exposed to these issues because they face a growing demand for blockchain developers and heightened cybersecurity risks related to data breaches and hacks.

3. Resource-intensive industries are developing blockchain applications to address environmental risks. Companies in the Utilities, Mining and Semiconductor industries are at the early stages of developing blockchain tools to address environmental risks related to resource use.

4. Early blockchain adopters in the Consumer Goods sector are integrating blockchain into data management systems with the aim of improving issues related to supply chain management. Companies in the Household and Personal Products (HPP) industry are using blockchain systems to address supply chain management issues and secure payment processing. Major Food Retail companies have been experimenting with blockchain to improve supply chain transparency and traceability for selected food products.

Looking at case studies related to these themes, we identify industry leaders across markets in Asia, North America and Europe. The 10 companies listed in the table below are at the forefront of innovating with blockchain and have strong management programs in place to mitigate relevant ESG risks.

Leading companies featured in the report


To learn more about these companies and our analysis, download the An ESG Lens on Blockchain and Public Equities full report.


Recent Content

Raising the Bar in Mining and Minerals for the Cleantech Supply Chain: The Role of Multi-Stakeholder Initiatives

In this article, we look at multi-stakeholder initiatives in the mining industry and how to mobilize investors to raise the bar for industry collaboration in the cleantech supply chain.

Filling in the Data Gaps: The Current State of Reporting on Principal Adverse Impacts Disclosures for the SFDR

In this blog we take a closer look at trends in data availability and reporting across mandatory and voluntary PAIs, and how investors can address their data gaps.

Portfolio Screening as Due Diligence Blog Header | Morningstar Sustainalaytics

Portfolio Screening as Due Diligence: How Investors Can Implement Responsible Business Conduct

This blog outlines how investors with access to screening options that follow the criteria of the OECD MNE Guidelines and the UNGPs can better assess investee companies’ risk of causing actual and potential adverse impacts. It shows what these research modules can look like and provides some examples outcomes on the effect of applying certain thresholds.

How to Achieve Net Zero? Match Action to Ambition

Morningstar Sustainalytics’ president on the gains and pains in the fight against climate change.