Skip to main content

Industry expert Jon Hale shares his views on attempts to discredit sustainable investing

Posted on August 14, 2018

Morningstar Sustainalytics
Morningstar Sustainalytics

In a new Medium article highly worth the read, Jon Hale, Global Head, Sustainable Investing Research at Morningstar, writes about recent misleading attacks on the credibility of ESG assessments and sustainable investing. He takes aim at a critical report from The American Council for Capital Formation, a Washington D.C. policy group financed by the National Association of Manufacturers, the fossil fuels industry and various other corporate lobbying organizations.

Jon shares his views on the motivations behind the ACCF’s report and its misinformed conflation of (known) flaws in ESG assessments and the overall validity of sustainable investing. He also counters criticisms of investment managers integrating ESG factors into their investment processes. Jon sets the record straight, pointing out that:

  • Large investment managers are engaging companies on ESG issues because they want to reduce risk and build long-term shareholder value;
  • Investors encouraging companies to look at their broader environmental, social and economic influence can both reduce long-term systemic risks and help create a context in which investments can flourish over the long run;
  • “Main street investors” support sustainable investing and sustainable investors are pressing these issues with companies because it is a path to long-term value creation and a more sustainable world;
  • When Morgan Stanley asked individual investors last year how interested they are in sustainable investing, 75% said they were either somewhat or very interested. And more than 70% agreed that having leading ESG practices can lead a company to higher profitability and make it a better long-term investment.

Read “Attacks on ESG from the Swamp” by Joh Hale.

Recent Content

Mobilizing the Private Sector for COP16 | Morningstar Sustainalytics

Mobilizing the Private Sector for COP16: A Critical Juncture for Biodiversity Action

This article highlights the key role of the private sector in addressing biodiversity loss ahead of the October COP16 summit. It leverages data from Morningstar Sustainalytics' engagement program to reveal how companies recognize biodiversity as a material issue, whether they give the issue board-level oversite, and whether they have a strategic approach to addressing nature and biodiversity loss.

Close-up of water droplet impacting still water.

Getting to Impact: Integrating Double Materiality in Responsible Investment Strategies

Learn the key distinctions between financial, impact and double materiality and the related implications for issuers and investors.

Living Up to the SRI Label: Strategies for Addressing Companies from High Impact Climate Sectors

Discover how investment firms can leverage LCTR data and company engagement to help ensure their sustainability-focused funds meet the increasingly stringent criteria from standard setters.

Clearing the Air With Canada’s Oil & Gas Sector | Morningstar Sustainalytics

Clearing the Air With Canada’s Oil & Gas Sector: The Interplay and Actions of Stakeholders on Greenwashing

Governments, corporations, and investors are under pressure to ensure transparency around their decarbonization strategies. This article covers the stakeholder responses to growing concerns of greenwashing risks in Canada’s oil and gas sector.