Skip to main content

Industry expert Jon Hale shares his views on attempts to discredit sustainable investing

Posted on August 14, 2018

Morningstar Sustainalytics
Morningstar Sustainalytics

In a new Medium article highly worth the read, Jon Hale, Global Head, Sustainable Investing Research at Morningstar, writes about recent misleading attacks on the credibility of ESG assessments and sustainable investing. He takes aim at a critical report from The American Council for Capital Formation, a Washington D.C. policy group financed by the National Association of Manufacturers, the fossil fuels industry and various other corporate lobbying organizations.

Jon shares his views on the motivations behind the ACCF’s report and its misinformed conflation of (known) flaws in ESG assessments and the overall validity of sustainable investing. He also counters criticisms of investment managers integrating ESG factors into their investment processes. Jon sets the record straight, pointing out that:

  • Large investment managers are engaging companies on ESG issues because they want to reduce risk and build long-term shareholder value;
  • Investors encouraging companies to look at their broader environmental, social and economic influence can both reduce long-term systemic risks and help create a context in which investments can flourish over the long run;
  • “Main street investors” support sustainable investing and sustainable investors are pressing these issues with companies because it is a path to long-term value creation and a more sustainable world;
  • When Morgan Stanley asked individual investors last year how interested they are in sustainable investing, 75% said they were either somewhat or very interested. And more than 70% agreed that having leading ESG practices can lead a company to higher profitability and make it a better long-term investment.

Read “Attacks on ESG from the Swamp” by Joh Hale.

Recent Content

Tire Supply Chains Face Rising Deforestation Risks as Traceability Requirements Tighten

Exploring how deforestation regulations and traceability requirements are reshaping natural rubber sourcing and ESG risks across tire supply chains.

Frameworks in Focus: Comparing NZIF 2.0 and SBTi Net Zero Standard for Financial Institutions

This article provides a comparison of NZIF 2.0 and the SBTi Net Zero Standard for Financial Institutions, and explores what they reveal about portfolio alignment, and climate transition strategies for asset owners and asset managers.

Heat, Policy and Portfolios: What This Summer's Climate Moment Revealed About Investor Priorities

Exploring how climate transition, nature investing and physical risk are reshaping investor priorities and portfolio strategies in a changing market.

US, Europe Biopharma Partnerships With Chinese Firms: Evaluating ESG Risks

Examining the ESG and geopolitical risks shaping US and European biopharma partnerships with Chinese firms.