Skip to main content

Searching for Solutions to Ocean Plastics

Posted on November 14, 2018

Martin Vezér
Martin Vezér
ESG Research Associate Director, Thematic Research

Over the past year, the public, regulators and investors have expressed growing concerns about the problem of ocean plastics. While some organizations have pledged to address the issue, our analysis of 4,575 companies in the sectors that generate most of the plastic waste on the planet reveals that less than 1% of these firms mention the phrase “ocean plastic” or “ocean health” in relevant corporate documents. This finding suggests a low level of strategic awareness about ocean plastics among companies exposed to the issue despite clear interest among consumers, law-makers and investors.

In our recently published ESG Spotlight report, Blue Investing: Searching for Solutions to Ocean Plastics, we take a deep dive into the plastics economy in search of publicly traded companies that are well positioned to mitigate the risk of extended producer responsibility and deliver sustainable solutions to plastic pollution. The approach we take supports what we call “blue investing” – that is, gaining portfolio exposure to firms committed to marine ecosystem conservation.

Among the eight firms featured in this report, we highlight BillerudKorsnäs, a Swedish paper packing company, and Adidas, a German footwear and apparel producer, to be among the players best prepared to contribute meaningful solutions to the problem of ocean plastics. BillerudKorsnäs offers a variety of biodegradable paper alternatives to plastic packaging and is exploring how starch-based materials can replace conventional food packaging. Adidas sold a million pairs of shoes made from recycled ocean waste in 2017 and announced in July 2018 that by 2024 it will only use recycled polyester in all its shoes and clothing. These and the other solutions offered by the companies featured in our report are far from a panacea, but they demonstrate the beginnings of what a blue investing thesis may look like.

The infographic below summarizes some of the considerations that motivated our study. To learn more about this project, including how we deployed a customized web-crawling tool and a suite of relevant environmental, social and governance (ESG) metrics to identify companies contributing potential solutions to the problems of plastic pollution, download our report, Blue Investing: Searching for Solutions to Ocean Plastics.

Recent Content

Biodiversity in the Balance Revisited | Sustainalytics

Biodiversity in the Balance: Revisiting Portfolio Risks

On the occasion of COP16, this article updates previous research from Morningstar Sustainalytics showing how investing in companies facing high levels of risk associated with biodiversity loss can have a material effect on long-term portfolio performance.

Green Buildings on the Rise | Morningstar Sustainalytcs

Green Buildings on the Rise: Why Building Products Matter

This article explains the role of building products companies in the global green building transition and why investors should consider them as part of their sustainable portfolios.

The Current State of EU Taxonomy Alignment in 2024 | Morningstar Sustainalytics

The Current State of EU Taxonomy Alignment in 2024

This article summarizes the findings from our first EU Taxonomy Reporting Review, examining alignment to KPIs on revenue, opex, and capex on more than 1,300 non-financial companies over the last two years.

Controversies Over Forever Chemicals Navigating the US Landscape of PFAS Regulations |Morningstar Sustainalytics

Controversies Over ‘Forever Chemicals’: Navigating the US Landscape of PFAS Regulations

The new US EPA drinking water standards and the CERCLA designation of PFOA and PFOS as hazardous substances show increased regulatory oversight and the expanding scope of potential liabilities across the supply chain. This report explores the latest regulatory developments concerning PFAS in the United States.