The future of food – part 2 of 2

Posted on July 30, 2018

Tytti Kaasinen
Tytti Kaasinen
Director, Stewardship Services

This blog originally appeared on GES International’s website and has been republished following Sustainaltyics’ acquisition of the company on 9 January 2019. See the press release for more information.

The first part of the blog underlined how food is the cause of all sorts of problems and negative impacts. But here comes the good news: sure, things are a bit gloomy and systems-thinking needed to address the food security challenge will be no easy feat, but experts reassure that we can feed the world within planetary boundaries and the EAT Forum confirmed that there are various encouraging developments underway. Many companies and individuals are coming up with innovative and/or technical solutions and authorities have woken up to the need to act.

The key changes most actors highlight as necessary include dietary shifts (towards plant-based but also e.g. improving the nutrition quality of packaged foods and enabling shoppers to make informed and sustainable choices), reduction in food loss and waste, better functioning trade, strict management of land and oceans and a sustainable intensification of production systems to close yield gaps. Needless to say, these changes present both material risks and opportunities for investors and they should hence be considered when analysing companies’ prospects as well as discussed in collaborative and one-to-one engagements. One example of an investor network focusing on food-related profitability and returns is FAIRR, which GES is a member of. FAIRR assesses risks associated with animal factory farming and encourages e.g. food producers to limit antibiotic use in livestock supply chains, and food retailers to strategically diversify their protein sources.

Many of the changes (must) happen on the individual level, however food is an emotive and personal issue and it is hard for policy-makers trying to regulate how people eat. Factors at play include culture, values, traditions and life choices, and money is not an insignificant influence either – at any stage of the food system. It is also worth noting – and a little bit sad – that marketing is much more efficient than education in changing minds and behaviour and, importantly, shaming rarely leads to positive changes. My other favourite concept, nudging, should therefore come in handy along with educators taking a leaf out of the marketers’ book and paying more attention to what people enjoy, not just what they ought (not) to do.

Summa summarum, the global food system is broken and must change for the benefit of our health, societies, economies and the environment. But this is now a recognised fact and the transformation has begun, or to quote Christiana Figueres: Cinderella has been invited to the ball. Indeed, all things considered, my most important takeaway from the EAT Forum discussions was that optimism is not the result of success, it’s the starting point for it.

Recent Content

European Union flag in the wind

Inconsistent Definition of ‘Sustainable Investments’ Across EU Regulations Could Cause (Unintentional) Greenwashing

The absence of clear parameters to support the regulatory definition of sustainable investments has pushed market participants to make judgment calls leading to diverging investor approaches.

Hands typing on a laptop

EU's Iterative Approach to Sustainable Finance Regulations Isn't Perfect, But It's a Good Start

The EU Action Plan for Sustainable Finance has kept the European investment market busy over the past year. In this blog post, we highlight the merits that we see in the EU regulatory package. While not perfect, the regulation is a good start.

Thematic Research: Investing in the Future of Transportation

The article offers an analysis of the ESG issues faced by companies engaged in the development of innovative transportation technologies.

A Closer Look at How and Where Net-Zero Commitments Are Falling Short

Read about the methods investors can use to measure portfolio alignment to net-zero and the importance of not only assessing climate transition plans, but also their governance structure and implementation.