Material Risk Engagement
Material Risk Engagement promotes and protects long-term value by engaging with high-risk companies on financially-material ESG issues.
The focus is on companies with the highest unmanaged ESG risks. We protect and develop the value of our clients’ portfolio companies through collaborative and constructive engagement that help companies better identify, understand and manage these ESG risks.
Constructed as an engagement overlay to Sustainalytics’ flagship ESG Risk Ratings, the engagement focuses on companies in our universe with an ESG Risk Ratings score of greater than 32, labeled as high or severe risk and within the worst performing half of their industry.
Key Features and Benefits
Engagement with over 250 high-risk companies on the most financially material ESG issues – as identified by Sustainalytics’ ESG Risk Ratings
With ~ 30 engagement managers Sustainalytics has a diverse and experienced team dedicated to engagement
Refined over more than 25 years, we follow a robust and proven approach to ESG engagement with face-to-face interactions, well-defined objectives and a strategy for each case
Covering more than 2 trillion dollars in assets under advisement (AuA), Sustainalytics is the largest engagement services provider, enabling us to leverage our pooled resources to increase our impact
Comprehensive coverage of our ratings universe covering > 4,500 companies
Unparalleled transparency with the option to attend engagement dialogues and access all ESG information, including company responses
Join our webinar to learn more
Join our webinar on April 2 to learn more about Material Risk Engagement and how investors can use Sustainalytics’ Material Risk Engagement to reduce their ESG-related portfolio risks, and support their portfolio management, stewardship, ESG integration, and proxy voting activities.
1. ESG Risk Management
Material Risk Engagement focuses on high-risk holdings, aiming to help companies better identify, understand and manage ESG risks.
2. ESG Integration
The assessment of responses and progress as well as other data points can improve investors’ insight into companies’ readiness and ability to mitigate ESG risks and opportunities.
3. ESG/SDG Reporting
Positive engagement cases are consistently tracked, which enable investors to report positive impact from the engagement to clients and beneficiaries. Engagements are also mapped against the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).
4. Proxy Voting
Engagements address material ESG Issues that may end up on companies’ AGM agendas, making case information a useful input for voting decisions.
5. Compliance with Stewardship Codes and International Guidelines
Engagement is a key element of guidelines for responsible investors, such as the Principles for Responsible Investing (PRI) and the OECD: Responsible business conduct for institutional investors, as well as relevant regulations, such as the UK Stewardship Code.
Engagement Overlay for Passive Strategies
By consistently engaging with all the highest risk companies on various indexes, Material Risk Engagement provides passive/index investors with the opportunity to meet their stewardship obligations and differentiate their fund by providing an engagement overlay.
How it Works
As soon as a company in the worst-performing half of its industry is assigned a risk rating above 32, the Material Risk Engagement engagement process commences.
The first meeting with the company is preferably face-to-face to build a common understanding of the company’s material ESG issue, creating the trust that is key for our partnership approach.
The engagement team defines change objectives and the engagement strategy is developed. The company also receives the first set of suggested actions to address management gaps in the Material ESG Issues.
Sustainalytics regularly follows up with the company and tracks progress on action points and positive developments. Change objectives and suggested actions are updated regularly to ensure continuous improvement.
An engagement case is closed when the company’s ESG Risk Rating improves to below a score of 28, or the company’s rating improves to the top 40% of its industry.